October 13, 2025

ROI Comparison: Workable vs. Greenhouse vs. Recooty – Which ATS Delivers the Best Return?

Name: Recooty
Price: 149.00 USD
Rating: 4.8 (250 reviews)
Author: Recooty

We have all been in the situation where you are stuck with an ATS which is doing the job right but you feel like the job would have been done better.

Hardik Vishwakarma

HR Tech Expert | Recognized voice in the future of work

Still Living With "Good Enough"? Let's Talk.

We have all been in the situation where you are stuck with an ATS which is doing the job right but you feel like the job would have been done better.

Take Workable. It is an open secret, but the $299 a month (along with a few additional fees) is beginning to weigh on what is otherwise a mid-market tool. Greenhouse? A juggernaut, surely, but with implementation costs, administration overhead, as well as the sort of pricing shocks that cause finance to turn their noses up.

Then there is Recooty - a bit quieter in the market, but consistently scoring perfect AI, clear pricing, and ROI values that leave you wondering why the larger companies charge what they do.

The thing is straightforward: in 2025, "good enough" is not. This analysis will reveal which platform is strong in what areas, where it is weak, and which one is actually financially viable and team-wise, considering your budget and team size.

In this review, we will have an obvious ROI winner based on the size of your business, supported by strict comparisons based on G2 rating, Crozdesk rating, and official product pages.

Our methodology:

Weighted feature scoring (50/30/20 on value delivery, costs, risks respectively)
TCO models over 1-3 years
Calculations on scenario-based ROI with actual user data of 2025 reviews

You will also be able to work out your own payback period and make a decision by the end.

TL;DR

Platform	Overall Score	Starting Price	Key Strength	ROI Estimate
Workable	92/100	$299/month	Streamlined Efficiency	245%
Greenhouse	88/100	Custom ($500+)	Enterprise Scalability	210%
Recooty	91/100	$79/month	AI-Powered Affordability	320%

Key Findings

Recooty scores higher in terms of value for money with flawless 10/10 G2 scores on AI features such as resume parsing, which saves the user 30+ hours/month on sourcing.
Workable: Applicant tracking (9.2/10) is workable and can be used in the medium-sized teams.
Greenhouse is the best at DE&I reporting of regulated industries at greater custom cost.

Bottom-Line Recommendations

Choose Recooty if:

Startup/SMB (<50 employees)
Looking to make fast ROI of less than $100/month

Choose Workable if:

Growing team (50-500 employees)
Should have balance of ease and features

Choose Greenhouse if:

Enterprise (>500 employees)
Want to have advanced integrations (even with longer payback)

The ROI of an ATS: What Does It Look Like?

In the case of ATS software, ROI is a ratio of the net financial gain of the increased hiring efficiency divided by total investment, including both:

Hard dollar savings (e.g. lowered agency fees)
Soft benefits (e.g., improved quality of hired workers)

A powerful ATS will transform the unmanaged recruiting into a machine that can be scaled, and will probably increase the revenue by 15-25% with expedited fills.

We Track 6 Key Metrics:

Cost per hire (target: <$4,000)
Time-to-hire (target: <30 days)
Efficiency in hiring (applications/hour)
Improvement in retention rate (goal: +10%)
Compliance savings (paid off fines)
Score on scalability (ease of growing rated by the user)

Methodology

ROI Formula:

ROI = (Gain from Investment - Cost of Investment) / Cost of Investment × 100

Comparison of Pricing Models between Platforms

Pricing Introduction: Recooty has the cheapest entry point, which is suitable to low-end teams. The tiered model proposed by Workable is appropriate in the market of the mid-range, and the pricing offered by Greenhouse is oriented towards those enterprises that conduct large-volume deals.

Pricing Breakdown

Platform	Starting Price	Tiers & Scaling	Add-Ons / Hidden Costs
Workable	$299/month ($3,588/year)	Standard ($299), Premier ($599), Scales based on employees	SSO / Priority Support in Premier
Greenhouse	Custom (est. $500–1,000+/month)	Basic / Professional / Enterprise, Based on jobs or locations	Texting features, Audit log / sandbox sync, Renewal increases 5–10%
Recooty	$79/month ($948/year)	Starter ($79, <20 emp), Standard ($149, indefinite), Premier (custom quote)	None — AI credits included (2K–5K/month)

TCO (3 Years, 100-Employee Company)

Workable: $12,564 - $24,564 (including 10 percent increase per year)
Greenhouse: $18,000 - $36,000 + $5,000-15,000 implementation
Recooty: $3,144 - $6,288 (lowest barrier to entry)

Cost Efficiency

Per User/Month:

Workable: ~$3
Greenhouse: ~$5-10 (estimated)
Recooty: $0.79 (Starter plan)

Per Hire:

Recooty: <$20
Workable: $60
Greenhouse: $100+

According to G2 value-for-money indexes: Recooty 9.8/10, Workable 8.7/10, Greenhouse 8.2/10

Value Delivery Measurement Above Price

Workable (92/100 Crozdesk Score)

Category	Details
Time Savings	25–40 hours/month saved via AI screening and auto-scheduling; $2,000/month at $50/hour recruiter rate (G2 reviews).
Efficiency Gains	9.2/10 in applicant tracking; custom pipelines reduce errors by 30%; 400M+ candidate database resurfaces old leads 20% faster.
Revenue Impact	Indirect 15% uplift via 25% faster time-to-hire (<25 days); referral portals boost internal hires by 10%.
Risk Reduction	GDPR tools and anonymized screening cut compliance risks by 50%, avoiding $10K+ fines; e-signatures reduce offer drop-offs by 15%.

Greenhouse (88/100 Score)

Category	Details
Time Savings	Automated task management saves 30+ hours/week on high-volume sourcing (3,489 G2 reviews average).
Efficiency Gains	8.8/10 for integrations (500+); DE&I nudges improve diversity hires by 20%.
Revenue Impact	18% retention uplift from structured interviews, saving $50K/year in turnover costs; sourcing automation fills roles 35% faster.
Risk Reduction	EEOC-compliant reporting reduces audit risks by 40%; audit logs (add-on) ensure traceability.

‍

Recooty (86/100, but 97/100 User Sentiment)

Category	Details
Time Savings	AI JD generator and parsing save 35 hours/month (G2 10/10 AI score).
Efficiency Gains	Instant posting to 200+ job boards; bulk actions cut processing time by 50%.
Revenue Impact	Top matches boost quality hires by 25%; indirect revenue +12% via faster scaling.
Risk Reduction	GDPR compliance; knockout questions minimize biases by 40%.

Implementation & Adoption: Time, Training and Effort

Platform Setup Requirements

Workable:

15 days of trial with full Standard facilities
Custom onboarding: 10-20 hours, $1,000-2,000 for Premier
Training: 4-8 hours in videos/self-service
Integration: Plug-and-play with LinkedIn/Zoom
G2 ease rating: 9.0/10

Greenhouse:

Needs professional advice
Implementation: 2-4 weeks, $5,000-15,000 fee
Training: 10-20 hours for advanced workflows
Integrations (HRIS/API): 5-10 hours additional complexity
G2 ease rating: 8.5/10

Recooty:

15-day trial (no credit card required)
Installation: <5 hours with bulk imports
Training: 2-4 hours through tutorials
AI tools and calendar sync adopt quickly
G2 ease rating: 9.7/10

TCO Effect on Implementation

Recooty: Reduces effort (increases TCO by 5%)
Workable: Balanced strategy (increases TCO by 10%)
Greenhouse: Resource intensive (increases TCO by 15-20%)

Calculations of Real ROI for Companies of Various Scales

We model three cases by calculating ROI = (Gains - Costs) / Costs × 100:

Small Company (20 employees, 10 hires/year) - Recooty Starter

Annual Costs: $948
Time Savings: $15,000
Revenue Gains: $10,000
Total Gains: $25,000
ROI: 2,537%
Break-even: 1 month
Payback Period: 45 days

Medium Company (100 employees, 50 hires/year) - Workable Standard

Annual Costs: $3,588
Time Savings: $50,000
Revenue Gains: $75,000
Total Gains: $125,000
ROI: 3,383%
Break-even: 3 months
Payback Period: 4 months
NPV (3% discount, 3 years): $320,000

Large Company (500 employees, 200 hires/year) - Greenhouse Advanced

Annual Costs: $12,000 + $7,500 implementation
Time Savings: $200,000
Revenue Gains: $300,000
Total Gains: $500,000
ROI: 3,983%
Break-even: 4 months
Payback Period: 6 months
NPV: $1.2M

Sensitivity Analysis

+20% costs: ROI drops by 15%
Best case scenario (high adoption): +50% ROI growth

Risk-Adjusted ROI: Adjusting to Market Stability

Taking into consideration all the risk factors, now we can estimate the ROI:

Workable:

Base ROI: 245%
Risk-adjusted ROI: 220%
Risk factors: Low vendor churn, 92% stability

Greenhouse:

Base ROI: 210%
Risk-adjusted ROI: 195%
Risk factors: Strong market position but renewal increases risk 10% loss of value

Recooty:

Base ROI: 320%
Risk-adjusted ROI: 300%
Risk factors: AI innovation with newer market entrant adds 5% uncertainty

Risk Assessment Categories

Implementation Risk: Recooty is least disrupted (1-week ramp)
Vendor Stability: All platforms stable; Greenhouse most trusted in enterprise
Market Position: Workable controls middle market
Future-Proofing: Recooty's AI capability will win in 2025+ trends

Use Case Scenarios to Select Your ATS

When Each Platform Wins

Workable Wins When:

Mid-sized technology companies (50-200 employees)
Dislike custom quotes, want standard features
Example: E-commerce business expands due to referral program increase

Greenhouse Wins When:

Regulated companies (200+ employees)
Focusing on DE&I and wide integrations
Example: Financial services handling high-volume compliance

Recooty Wins When:

Startups/SMBs (<50 employees)
Dedicated to AI-driven affordability
Example: Recruiting agencies posting to 200+ job boards quickly

Feature Comparison: Head-to-Head Analysis

We compared the platforms on key ATS features that customers put the most value on. The results are based on G2/Crozdesk user ratings where available.

Feature	Workable	Greenhouse	Recooty
Job Posting & Distribution	✅ 200+ boards, LinkedIn/Indeed integration	✅ AI-powered posting, Multi-board distribution	✅ 250+ job sites, One-click posting
Applicant Tracking	✅ CRM database, AI screening (9.2/10)	✅ End-to-end tracking, Advanced pipeline	✅ AI parsing, Smart dashboard
Interview Management	✅ Auto-scheduling, Interview kits	✅ AI interview plans, Structured process	✅ Smart calendar sync, Feedback collection
Reporting & Analytics	✅ Custom reports, API access	✅ Scalable analytics, DE&I insights	✅ Data-driven insights, Performance metrics
AI / Matching Technology	✅ AI sourcing & JD drafting, Score: 9.5/10	✅ AI summaries & plans, Score: 9.0/10	✅ AI screening & matching, Score: 10/10
Integrations	✅ 270+ tools, Popular platforms	✅ 500+ integrations, Enterprise focus	✅ 100+ tools, Essential connections
Compliance Tools	✅ GDPR/EEO compliance, ISO/SOC certified	✅ Enterprise compliance, Audit capabilities	✅ GDPR compliant, Bias reduction tools

The Ultimate Verdict: What ATS is the Most Valuable?

Overall Winner: Recooty (9.2/10)

Unbeatable AI capabilities
Extensive job posting coverage at low cost
Best fit for SMBs who focus on efficiency

Runner-up: Workable (9.0/10)

Most appropriate combination of features and usability
Strong mobile support
Ideal for mid-market businesses

Enterprise Choice: Greenhouse (8.8/10)

Deep scalability and customization
Advanced compliance and reporting
Good value for large organizations

The Clear Choice for SMBs

When looking to save money and time on hiring, Recooty is the obvious winner when it comes to small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs).

With its flawless 10/10 G2 scores on AI-based capabilities such as resume parsing and job descriptions, Recooty will save 35+ hours per month, which is equivalent to $1,750 in recruiter time at a rate of $50/hour.

Recooty offers the best price-to-performance ratio, with prices of only $79/month and a no-card trial period of 15 days, which is unmatched performance for SMBs (less than 50 employees), beating the performance of Workable and Greenhouse.

Inefficient hiring can bring your growth to a halt, but with a free Recooty trial, you can begin saving money today and determine ROI with our template!

‍

Budgets regarding hiring are being strained on every side.

CFOs need reduced cost-per-hire. Manager hiring is about faster results. Applicants are demanding superior experiences. Your recruiters, on the other hand, are being overwhelmed by a load of administration that adds no value but is consumed by hours per day.

The traditional model of recruitment, which is to employ additional recruiters, advertise on more boards, and wish to have improved results, is not on the menu any longer. Intelligent businesses are starting to realize that automation does not mean doing it faster; it means radically altering the way recruiting expenses and how that money is spent.

The guide below will demonstrate how to work out you cost-per-hire savings when you adopt the automation services offered by Recooty. Most importantly, it will teach you to determine the gains that are most applicable to your organization and not the ones everybody is talking about.

The Reality Behind Cost-Per-Hire
‍

The issue with most HR teams is that the majority of them fail to estimate the real cost-per-hire, due to the fact they fail to consider the hidden costs that are consuming their budget. The formula of calculation is easy to read on paper, however, the situation is not that straightforward.

This is what you are actually measuring:

Cost-Per-Hire = (External Costs + Internal costs)/Number of Hires.

‍The tricky part? It is those internal costs that make most organizations bleed without being aware of it.
Internal Costs: The Budget Killers You Are LackingYour recruiters are currently wasting about 40 percent of their time in manual tasks that can be automated tomorrow. The same period is directly translated into salary expenses that give no value in the hiring.

Think about this breakdown of the real whereabouts of your internal recruitment budget:.

• Time a recruiter spends on resume screening, where they have to go through hundreds of applications and one by one, manually, to filter out those that do not even qualify as a basic requirement.
• The time of the hiring manager spent in coordinating interviews rather than assessment of candidates.
• Scheduling, rescheduling, and communications with the candidates overheads.
• Technology expenses on various disintegrated tools that do not communicate with one another.
• Co-ordination duration between team members using varied systems and processes.

The majority of the companies find that they spend 2-3 hours of administrative task on every hour of the actual recruiting process. It is money that you are already wasting just inefficiently.
External Costs: When Conventional Solutions FailRecent years have seen the external recruitment cost blow out of proportion yet most organizations are still following the same old formula of pouring more money into job boards and hoping that they will achieve different results.

The external cost reality check consists of:

• Job board fees that continue declining as the quality of responses declines.
• Commission can go up to 30 percent of first-year pay.
• Background check services that take time to hand over your process manually.
• Service subscriptions your team hardly utilizes at all.

Worse still, such external costs tend to be counterproductive rather than producing a unified hiring process.

Your Step-by-Step Reduction of Cost-Per-Hire Calculation
‍

The thing is, this can be exemplified by a real-life example where most mid-sized companies undergo the implementation of recruitment automation.The Before Picture: The Conventional Recruitment Spending Consider a month in which a company takes 10 employees:

What You're Paying Your Team:

‍• Two full-time recruiters are paid 6000 each = 12000.
• Hiring Managers who take 20 hours of coordination = $4,000.
• Administrative coordination (scheduling, communications) = $ 2,000.

‍Internal monthly total: $18,000What You are Paying The Outside Vendors:

• Placing of job boards in various locations = $3,000.
• Agency fee of positions that are hard-to-fill = $15,000.
• Background checks on a per hire basis of 120 = 1200.
• Evaluation tools and subscriptions = $800.
• External monthly total: $20,000.

Your present math: $38,000/ 10 hires = $3,800/ hire.The After Picture: Efficiency of the Automated Recruitment There is the same company, identical recruitment criteria, and yet Recooty does the heavy lifting:

What you are paying your team (now smarter):

• Efficiency gains (one and one-half recruiters) = 9,000.
• Cost of hiring managers who spend 8 hours on actual assessment = $1,600.
• Eliminated administrative overhead almost = $0.500.
• Recooty platform subscription = 2000.
‍
‍Internal monthly total: $13,100What You are Paying Outside Vendors (Less Dependency):

• Automation of job distributions on bulk rates = $1,500.
• Reduced agency dependency = $5,000.
• Background checks in large numbers = 800.
• Great combined evaluation skills = $400
• External monthly total: $7,700.

Your new math: $20,800 / 12 hires = $1,733 per hireNumbers That Matter to Your CFO• Reduction per hire: $3800-$1733= $2067 less per head.
• Percentage change- 54.4% cost reduction.
• Monthly savings: $2,067 x 12 hires = $24,804
• Annual benefit: close to $300,000 in saving.

You are also employing 20% more individuals with the same team and this implies that your cost-per-hire decrease is being used to finance your growth.

Industry Reality Check: Where You Are
‍

The cost-per-hire also drastically depends on the industry, however, the tendencies are the same; organizations that apply automation are outperforming the ones that are trapped in the manual process by far.

• Technology firms: $4, 000 -6, 500 to hire (Automation users are 35 percent less average than manual processes)
• Medical organizations: $3,500 -5, 200 per employee (automation reporting 40% cuts)
• Financial services: $4,500 -7,000 per employee (largest automation ROI based on compliance needs)
• Manufacturing: $2,800 -4,200 per recruit (automation will cut time-to-hire by half)
• Retail: $1500 - 3000 per hire (volume hiring experiencing a tremendous improvement in efficiency)

How Recooty Turns the Cost-Per-Hire Game
‍

The sole concern of the majority of automation tools is to make the current processes faster. Recooty does it another way, it eradicates the processes which should not be there at all. On average, an effective ATS is proven to decrease the hiring cycle by as much as 60%.AI-Powered Sourcing The conventional candidate sourcing is close to searching a needle in a haystack with blindfold on. Your recruiters are scrolling through profiles and making educated guesses regarding the fit of the candidate in addition to manually reaching out to potential candidates who may not be interested at all.

Artificial intelligence in the sourcing at Recooty reverses this:

• Smart candidate discovery occurs on multiple platforms at once as your team concentrates on conversations and not searches.
• Automated profile matching does not involve the guessing game with key words, but the actual job requirements.
• Available in real-time, you are only reaching candidates who are willing to opportunity.
• Predictive scoring prioritizes the applicants according to their chances of accepting, rather than on paper qualifications.

The result? In the first month, most of the teams reduced their time spent on repetitive tasks by 80% percentage. Not only is that quicker recruiting, but that is actually transforming the quality candidate-to-pay ratio.Screening of Candidates Devoid of BottlenecksThe most common bottlenecks in the hiring process are Resume parsing and initial screening. You and your team waste hours going through applications that must not have passed the first filter.

The automation of screening candidates at Recooty deals with this directly:

• Incident intelligent resume parsing removes manual screening of relevant skills and experience.
• Automated qualification scoring will use your real needs in place of generic filters.
• Video interview pre-screening saves you the time of having candidates taking up your teams time, by licensing themselves.
• Automation of reference checks removes the two-way communication that usually causes weeks to your process.
Automation of Workflows: Slay the Busy WorkThe administration aspects that are taking your time as a recruiting team are unnecessary and just an necessary evil to keep the process going. Until now.

The workflow automation by Recooty eliminates the busy work completely:

• Automated job distribution applies your job openings to 250+ job boards in a single click, not fifty.
• Smart scheduling arranges interviews along with the real availability of all the people and not the email tennis.
• Candidate communication sequences allow the candidates to remain busy with personalized messages without necessarily having to send them manually.
• The interview coordination can be used to make confirmations, reminders and rescheduling without human intervention.
• Offer management simplifies approvals and document creation which typically engages several individuals and systems.
Informed Decisions, No GuessworkThe majority of recruitment analytics inform you of what occurred when it was already too late to be of consequence. The analytics dashboard created by Recooty concentrates on what is in control:

• Performance tracking on a real-time basis will make you aware of the sources that are providing you with quality candidates at this moment.
• Cost analysis spends out your actual spending per hire on all channels and activities.
• The identification of the bottlenecks identifies precisely where candidates are stalling on your process.
• Quality correlation relates the source effectiveness with long term success on hiring.
• Industry benchmarking reveals the comparison of your metrics with the companies, which face the same predicament.

To Bring to Fruition Timeline: What to Expect When
‍

Week 1-4: Foundation and Quick WinsSetting up of platform and connecting with existing systems. Team training and preliminary process documentation. Concentrate on job distribution automating and simple screening of candidates.

‍Anticipated effect: 20-30% less work in the administrative department, instant changes in the efficiency of job posting.Weeks 5-12: Complete Implementation and optimizationComplex workflow automation in the whole hiring process. The use of analytics dashboard and optimization of sources. Personalized communication message and coordination of interviews.

‍Anticipated outcome: Cost-per-hire will be reduced between 40-50 percent, time-to-hire and quality of candidates will improve.
Weeks 13-26: Experienced Strategy and ScalingInterdepartmental, role-specific workflow development. Demand forecasting of hiring through predictive analytics. On-going streamlining on the basis of performance data.

‍Projected effect: 50-65% drop in cost-per-hire rate and no or better quality indicators.

How Recooty Does More Than Simple Automation
‍

The largest error that companies commit is that they automate the bad processes rather than initially fixing them. The first thing you should do before you choose to automate your processes is to map out your existing candidate journey and see the steps that simply should not be there in the first place.

The first step to candidate journey optimization is to know what points people are lost in your process and why. The automation of the workflow in Recooty can remove up to 15 manual processes per hire, however, the key is that you should be removing the correct processes.

The integration strategy is more than what people believe. Unless Recooty is communicating with your HRIS, payroll system, and onboarding platform, you are building new silos rather than destroying the old.

The monitoring of performance must be based on the leading rather than lagging indicators. Record time-to-first-interview, rather than time-to-hire. Track the candidate response rates to various communication templates. Hire only when satisfaction with the quality of candidates is achieved by the hiring manager and not their number.

FAQs
‍

When will I realize ROI of automation of recruitment?Majority of the organizations break the breakeven mark in 6-8 months, although you will see the cost reductions in the second month. The point is that automation develops various value streams - fewer expenditures on the internal organization, higher efficiency of spending on the external one and quicker recruitment that influences the business performance. All these advantages are cumulative and that is why the ROI of year 2 is normally 300-400 times more than the year one.What will be the case when automation decreases the quality of candidates?It is the fear that most people share, and it is rooted in the misconception of the modern automation functioning. Recooty does not override the human judgment, it gets rid of the administrative stuff so your team can concentrate on the evaluation and the building of relationships. The quality is actually increased since recruiters handle more time as they talk to candidates and minimal time in pushing paper. It is all about good installation and constant supervision, and that is why the assistance in implementation is important.

About the author

Hardik Vishwakarma

HR Tech Expert | Recognized voice in the future of work

View Full Profile →

Hardik Vishwakarma‍
HR Tech Expert | Recognized voice in the future of work

View Full Profile →

Hardik Vishwakarma is a recognized leader in HR automation and AI-driven recruitment, bringing over a decade of hands-on expertise in transforming talent acquisition through cutting-edge technology. With more than 10 years of progressive experience in the recruitment industry, Hardik has worked at the intersection of human resources and innovation, spearheading the adoption of AI applicant tracking software and recruitment management solutions for businesses of all sizes.

Hardik’s career is defined by his deep understanding of the recruitment technology ecosystem. He has mastered the functionalities and strategic deployment of over 27 recruitment CRM and ATS platforms, making him one of the most technologically versatile professionals in the HR tech domain. His insights into AI recruitment management software and applicant tracking software have helped organizations optimize their hiring processes, reduce time-to-hire, and improve candidate quality through intelligent automation.

Throughout his career, Hardik has been a passionate advocate for leveraging AI to solve traditional hiring challenges. His work focuses on delivering scalable recruitment solutions that align with modern business demands — from streamlining applicant tracking workflows to deploying predictive analytics for smarter hiring decisions. Whether it's customizing ATS systems to meet specific HR needs or integrating AI recruitment tools to drive efficiency, Hardik brings a forward-thinking, results-driven mindset to every project.

Hardik’s thought leadership in AI recruitment is backed by real-world implementation success across diverse industries. He has consulted startups, mid-sized companies, and enterprise HR teams on adopting AI-powered recruitment strategies that not only enhance operational performance but also create a competitive edge in attracting top talent. His strategic approach combines technical acumen with a deep appreciation for human-centric hiring, ensuring that automation supports — rather than replaces — the recruiter’s role.

In addition to his technical expertise, Hardik is known for demystifying complex recruitment technologies, making him a sought-after voice in the HR tech community. He regularly shares insights on evolving trends in AI applicant tracking software, recruitment automation tools, and the future of talent acquisition powered by machine learning and intelligent data systems.

With a relentless drive for innovation and a decade-long commitment to HR transformation, Hardik Vishwakarma stands at the forefront of the AI recruitment revolution — empowering organizations to build smarter, faster, and more strategic hiring systems.